Whereas, on February 19, 2025, Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department officers were called to resolve a private matter at Representative Cory Mills’s residence, where officers were called to the 1300 block of Maryland Avenue, Southwest around 1:15 p.m. for the report of an assault;

Whereas police reports obtained by NBC4 Washington confirmed that the Washington, DC, Metropolitan Police Department was investigating Representative Cory Mills for an alleged assault of a 27-year-old woman that took place on February 19, 2025, at the residence of Representative Cory Mills;

Whereas the first police report, provided to NBC4 Washington by a source and confirmed by a second source familiar with the investigation, said that the 27-year-old woman accused her significant other for over a year of having grabbed her, shoved her, and pushed her out of the door, and also said that the woman involved showed the officer bruises on her arm which appeared fresh;

Whereas NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department identified Representative Cory Mills as the significant other of the alleged victim of assault—which alleged victim was a 27-year-old woman who was not the wife of Representative Cory Mills—and that the alleged victim let officers hear Subject 1 [now identified by MPD as Representative Cory Mills] instruct her to lie about the origin of her bruises . . . Eventually, Subject 1 made contact with police and admitted that the situation escalated from verbal to physical, but it was severe enough to create bruising;

Whereas, on February 21, 2025, the Washington Post also confirmed two DC police officials said that the alleged victim of assault initially told a 911 operator and police that she had been assaulted and that officers said she also had what seemed to be visible injuries, and that while a supervisor initially classified the offense internally as a family disturbance, police commanders later learned of the incident, reviewed the reports and body camera footage from the responding officers, and reclassified the case as a domestic violence assault;

Whereas, on February 21, 2025, NBC4 Washington also reported that the Metropolitan Police Department determined that probable cause to arrest Representative Cory Mills for misdemeanor assault existed and sent an arrest warrant for Representative Cory Mills to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia;

Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show the alleged victim had noticeable injuries to the lower part of her right eye and injuries/bruises to her arms consistent with signs of a physical assault, and the alleged victim stated the man who attacked her, who she later identified as Representative Cory Mills, was a prominent person who has suddenly become very abusive;

Whereas, on April 18, 2026, the Washington Post reported body-camera footage and documents show Representative Cory Mills instructed the alleged victim to explain the injuries she sustained by telling law enforcement they were from our vacation and that I bruise easily and later Representative Cory Mills told police he wanted to call Pam Bondi, who at the time was serving as Attorney General of the United States;

Whereas, on July 14, 2025, a different former romantic partner of Representative Cory Mills, who was apparently in a relationship with Representative Mills from November 2021 to February 2025, reported to authorities in Florida that Representative Mills threatened to release nude images and other intimate videos of her and threatened to harm her future romantic partners in retaliation for her decision to end a relationship with Representative Mills after seeing the public reports described above concerning the alleged February 2025 physical assault;

Whereas, on October 14, 2025, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida, issued a Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, based on a finding that his former romantic partner was a victim of dating violence or had reasonable cause to believe she was in imminent danger of becoming a victim of another an act of dating violence;

Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included May want to tell every guy you date that if we run into each other at any point. Strap up cowboy and You want to date or be with someone else. Be my guest. But they need to know well in advance that if we cross paths, I don’t care this week, this month, or this decade. They better damn well know it’s coming every time;

Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Representative Cory Mills acknowledged sending electronic messages, which included I can send him a few videos of you as well[.] Oh I still have them[.] and Thanks again for the videos;

Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found The Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] acknowledged the Petitioner requested he please leave her alone on May 22, 2025. Despite this request, the Respondent [Representative Cory Mills] continued to send electronic messages to the Petitioner through June 2025, ignoring her eleven (11) separate requests to be left alone;

Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found Petitioner testified, and the evidence supported, the Respondent’s [Representative Cory Mills’] communications caused her substantial emotional distress considering her professional commitments. She described herself as being physically ill, curled in the fetal position requiring family assistance, suffering hives, seeking professional therapy, and being prescribed Xanax and Lexapro, which she took on multiple occasions due to the Respondent’s [Representative Cory Mills’] actions, and that she altered her daily routine out of fear, impairing her ability to perform her job duties and to live a normal life;

Whereas, in the Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Dating Violence against Representative Cory Mills, the Circuit Court of the Third Judicial Circuit in Columbia County, Florida found that after Representative Cory Mills learned of the Petitioner’s attempts to seek an injunction for protection, he used the phone of the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, assault to contact the Petitioner, caused the alleged victim of the February 19, 2025, domestic assault to contact her, contacted her family members, and caused a public employee under his direct supervision to contact her;

Whereas, prior to serving in the House of Representatives, Representative Cory Mills founded Pacem Solutions International LLC and Pacem Defense LLC, and acquired AMTEC Corporation (now renamed as ALS, Inc.), companies which engage in security and military contracting with the United States Government as well as foreign nations;

Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct found from January 2023 to present, Pacem Defense/ALS, has been actively contracting with the Federal Government, securing close to $1,000,000 in Federal contracts for munitions and weapons, distributed to prisons across the country. Specifically, since January 9, 2024, 94 contracts have been awarded to entities owned by Rep. Mills and went on to conclude there is substantial reason to believe that Rep. Mills may have entered into, held, or enjoyed contracts with Federal agencies while he was a Member of Congress in violation of House rules, standards of conduct, and Federal law;

Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct noted According to its website, Pacem Solutions is currently registered and/or partnered with trusted local firms to work in the following countries: United States, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, UAE, Australia, Kenya, Malaysia and Kuwait. Public reports indicate companies owned by Representative Cory Mills sought, or entered into contracts, to sell munitions to foreign nations while serving as a member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Armed Services—representing a clear and troubling conflict of interest;

Whereas, in August 2024, the Office of Congressional Conduct adopted and transmitted to the Committee on Ethics of the House of Representatives a report indicating that there was substantial reason to believe that Representative Cory Mills may have omitted or misrepresented required information in his financial disclosure statements, accepted excessive contributions to his campaign committee in the form of personal loans and contributions that may not have derived from Representative Cory Mills’ personal funds, and entered into, enjoyed, or held contracts with Federal agencies;

Whereas individuals who served in the military with Representative Cory Mills have called into question the veracity of the account of events which formed the basis of a recommendation that Representative Cory Mills receive an award of a Bronze Star, bestowed in 2021, for his service under enemy fire in Iraq in 2003;

Whereas, in August 2024, Representative Cory Mills provided the Daytona Beach News with documents purporting to prove that he earned a Bronze Star with heroism, including a Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star which includes a signature from then-Army Brigade Commander Arnold N. Gordon-Bray;

Whereas Retired Brigadier General Arnold N. Gordon-Bray has stated he did not personally write, read, or sign the Department of the Army Form 638 recommending Representative Cory Mills for a Bronze Star;

Whereas five people who served with Representative Cory Mills, including two men who were reported as having been personally saved by Representative Cory Mills at great risk to his own life as a basis for the recommendation for his Bronze Star in the Department of the Army Form 638, disputed that Representative Cory Mills was involved in their rescue or provided life-saving care;

Whereas one Private First Class cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills’s Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star denied that Representative Cory Mills provided him any aid and also denied that his injuries were life threatening;

Whereas one Sergeant cited as having been involved in one of the listed achievements on Representative Cory Mills’s Army Form 638 recommending him for a Bronze Star called the account a fabrication and claimed that he was not involved in any claims that Cory Mills makes about me;

Whereas Representative Cory Mills’s employment application to DynCorp Internation al stated he served in the United States Army 75th Ranger Regiment and attended United States Army Sniper School, claims which are not corroborated by his military records; and

Whereas such conduct by Representative Cory Mills affects the dignity and integrity of the proceedings of the House and brings discredit upon the House: Now, therefore, be it